The design-build model often appears enticing. A single entity managing both design and construction seems efficient, promising seamless communication and cost savings. However, my professional experience has shown that this approach is far from ideal for those truly seeking personalized, high quality results. Here are some key reasons why hiring separate professionals for design and construction is a better choice.

Limited Creativity and Bland Outcomes

Back in the early 2000's, I was employed by a general contractor, hired to assist with the selections for new builds. While I did learn, construction administration skills, the position turned out to be frustrating. Design build firms often focus on meeting budget constraints than on creating a home that reflects the client’s personality or unique vision. I found myself unable to explore my creativity, as every decision was filtered through a financial limitation. The result? Homes were uninspiring and lacked character. Instead of achieving something exceptional, the projects ended up feeling generic, as if designed by a spreadsheet rather than a professional designer.

Compromising on Quality

In one particularly frustrating instance, I had to reassure a client that using a precast stone for their fireplace surround was acceptable so the builder could complete the home on time. While it may have seemed like a practical solution, I knew that opting for a natural stone would have elevated the space dramatically. These compromises, often driven by the builder's convenience or cost considerations, undercut the integrity of the design and leave clients settling for less than they deserve.

"

Design-Build sounds great until you realize that steamlined process means no one to check your bad decisions.

Defending Mediocrity

Another major issue with design-build firms is accountability. When installations were sloppy or below standard, I found myself in an uncomfortable position of defending the general contractor instead of advocating for the client. The G.C. did cut my checks afterall. As a designer, my role should be to represent the client’s vision and ensure their expectations are met or exceeded, not to smooth over mistakes made by the construction team.

Costly Trap

I once had a client who paid me $3K to help design their primary bathroom. While looking for a contractor, they encountered one who promised a complete remodel cost of $150K. However, the contractor’s design team insisted on redrafting the plans for an additional $20K. Ha! I’ve been drafting plans for over 20 years and don't charge anywhere near that for a bathroom plan. Anyhow, that’s not the point. The client bought into the idea, paid for the new set of drawings, and then the contractor came back and doubled the cost they originally quoted. Are you serious? Ultimately the clients were embarrassed and called me back when they found a more reliable General Contractor. They realized too late how manipulative the design-build model can be.

When design and construction are handled by the same team, issues are often brushed under the table. A separate designer or architect acts as an independent advocate for the client, ensuring transparency and holding the construction team accountable. This critical layer of oversight is missing in the design-build model.

What is Designer's Corner?